1992 Audi 80 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360

To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.

Compare all specifications: