1992 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar S-Type (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 400 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1963 Jaguar S-Type | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 80 | S-Type |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
