1992 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230.
Because 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 (216 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 | |
Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 80 | 230 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1295 kg |