1992 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Riley 4
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 122 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1963 Riley 4 | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | 80 | 4 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |