1992 Audi 80 vs. 1966 Holden EH

To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80. 1966 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: