1992 Audi 80 vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 80 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1290 kg |
