1992 Audi 80 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 810 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2180 kg |
