1992 Audi 80 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (96 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (175 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Celica |
Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1180 kg |