1992 Audi 80 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
