1992 Audi 80 vs. 1986 Lada Samara
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1986 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1986 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1986 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Audi | Lada |
| Model | 80 | Samara |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 920 kg |
