1992 Audi 80 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Audi | Rover |
| Model | 80 | 200 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1205 kg |
