1992 Audi 80 vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Because 1999 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota MR2. (183 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 940 kg |