1992 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2001 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar X-Type (194 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 190 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar X-Type (244 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2001 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 80 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1560 kg |
