1992 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2001 Lancia Zeta is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Zeta (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 230 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2001 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Audi | Lancia |
| Model | 80 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1600 kg |
