1992 Audi 80 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForFour. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Audi | Smart |
| Model | 80 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 970 kg |
