1992 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |