1992 Audi 80 vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 308 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Ka |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 962 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |