1992 Audi 80 vs. 2003 Lada Niva
To start off, 2003 Lada Niva is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2003 Lada Niva | |
Make | Audi | Lada |
Model | 80 | Niva |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1210 kg |