1992 Audi 80 vs. 2003 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2003 Toyota Camry is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Camry (160 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Camry (221 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80. 2003 Toyota Camry has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Camry will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2003 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Camry |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1360 kg |