1992 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 360 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80. 2005 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: