1992 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (227 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 200 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (284 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 80 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1570 kg |
