1992 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 300 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: