1992 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 370 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1740 kg |