1992 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 476 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1746 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
