1992 Audi 80 vs. 2006 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 MG ZT-T is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT-T (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT-T weights approximately 445 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 MG ZT-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG ZT-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZT-T (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2006 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | 80 | ZT-T |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 4599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1815 kg |