1992 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 404 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (325 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 966 kg |
