1992 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 773 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | 80 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
