1992 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Sable (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Sable weights approximately 556 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Sable (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: