1992 Audi 80 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 471 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1992 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1992 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1741 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1842 mm |