1992 Audi 80 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Audi 80 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | 80 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
