1992 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 80 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1585 mm |