1992 Audi 80 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1992 Audi 80. (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1992 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 946 kg more than 1992 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (226 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Audi 80. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2316 kg |