1992 Audi 80 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 174 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Audi 80 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | 80 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2309 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1196 kg |