1992 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1992 Beijing BJ 212 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1992 Beijing BJ 212. (87 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1992 Beijing BJ 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1992 Beijing BJ 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Beijing BJ 212. (181 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Beijing BJ 212.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Beijing BJ 212 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Beijing | Cadillac |
Model | BJ 212 | 62 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3300 mm |