1992 BMW 316 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 316 would be higher. Both 1992 BMW 316 and 2008 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 1,596 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1992 BMW 316. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 316.
Because 1992 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 316 (150 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 316 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |