1992 BMW 318 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 318 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 318 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 318 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 318 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 318 (180 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 318 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1992 BMW 318 has manual transmission. 1992 BMW 318 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 318 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 318 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3260 mm |
