1992 BMW 320 vs. 1968 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1992 BMW 320 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1992 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 725 kg more than 1992 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 320 | 1968 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 320 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |