1992 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA

To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1992 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 420 kg more than 1992 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 653 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 320. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications: