1992 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1992 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 120 kg more than 1992 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (250 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 320. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 320 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |