1992 BMW 332 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 BMW 332 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,152 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 332 weights approximately 74 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1992 BMW 332 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 BMW 332. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 332 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1992 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3152 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |