1992 BMW 332 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 332 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 332 (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 332 | 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 332 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2210 mm |
