1992 BMW 332 vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1999 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 65 kg more than 1992 BMW 332.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 332. (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 332.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 332 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 62 L |