1992 BMW 332 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 332 weights approximately 142 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 332 (355 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 1992 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 332 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 332 | Artic |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
