1992 BMW 332 vs. 2001 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2001 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econoline weights approximately 925 kg more than 1992 BMW 332.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 332 (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 2001 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 332 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3152 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |