1992 BMW 332 vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2005 Ford Falcon. (200 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 141 kg more than 1992 BMW 332.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 332. (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 332.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 332 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |