1992 BMW 332 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 332 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 332 (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 332 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |