1992 BMW 332 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1992 BMW 332. (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 332. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 311 kg more than 1992 BMW 332. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 332. (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 332.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 332 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 332 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |