1992 BMW 332 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 332. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 332 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 BMW 332 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 332 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 332 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 33 kg more than 1992 BMW 332.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 332 (355 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 332 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 BMW 332 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 332 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 97 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 51 L |
