1992 BMW 518 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 BMW 518. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 BMW 518 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1992 BMW 518. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1992 BMW 518. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1992 BMW 518. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 BMW 518. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 BMW 518.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 518 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 518 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1766 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |