1992 BMW 520 vs. 1951 Holden FX
To start off, 1992 BMW 520 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 BMW 520 weights approximately 518 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1992 BMW 520 | 1951 Holden FX | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 520 | FX |
Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |